Upload picasa photos to google photos9/20/2023 ![]() However, the Windows Live Essentials 2012 version will seem familiar to power users of Microsoft software Circa 2009, such as Windows 7 and Office 2010, though it is a difficult interface for people to learn. Windows 8 and newer have a simplistic photo viewer built in that Microsoft recommends as a replacement for the Windows Photo Gallery. It is Windows only and was last updated in 2012. Windows Photo Gallery is part of the Windows Live Essentials package and can be installed for free from the Microsoft website. ![]() Pros: Ease of Use, cordless syncing from Apple’s Mobile devices, RAW Support, Organizes PhotosĬons: limited Platforms, takes exclusive control of photos Windows Photo Gallery Photos, like iPhoto, stores your images in a document bundle that you cannot interact with directly, thus trapping your images in the software sans intervention from a command line ninja. I’ve been surprised at the simple learning curve getting used to Photos, though clients coming from iPhoto do feel like the rug was pulled out from under them, as Photos lacks many features (like albums) my clients used in iPhoto. Photos can import images from Camera cards and, building upon the iCloud service, sync photos across your Apple devices over the network, no plugging cords in. There are no Windows, Linux, or Android versions. That was a decade ago and trying to reclaim that mojo while adapting to the mobile world they have released Photos, which I will be calling Apple Photos to try to reduce confusion.Īpple Photos is designed to work the same on iOS and Mac OS. Pros: Multiple Libraries, RAW Support, Organizes PhotosĬons: Price, limited Platforms, Unreliable, Difficult to use Apple PhotosĪpple at one point dominated the photo organizer market with their iPhoto product. But the biggest negative is there is a steep learning curve to get started using this software. The catalog files are too easy to corrupt, and it is expensive. It’s not the most reliable software…move photos around outside its interface and it does not follow the moves. However, it is only available for Windows and Mac. Lightroom imports photos from camera cards, supports RAW adjustments, tags images, and allows me to group photos in folders on my computer. It supports multiple Libraries, which is a nice feature, though not one of my criteria. Let’s look at some candidates though: Adobe LightroomĪdobe’s Lightroom product is first and foremost designed for professional photographers. As we will see, this puts me in a difficult position because, thus far, I have found nothing that meets all these needs. Third, any software I recommend must be reliable and work on the devices my clients use. The software should let me group, tag, and search for photos. The second criteria is it must organize I need to be able to import photos form camera cards and mobile devices. My photos must remain in my possession and accessible to me. I think the first criteria is that a photo manager must leave me in control. How can I select and choose a software package to recommend? I need some criteria against which to evaluate a product. If Google Photos is the only place all my photos exist, do they really exist? I have no control over Google so what is to keep them from cutting off my access to my photos some day because they decide they can’t make money off my photos? So, for all the polish and ease of sharing photos, I cannot recommend this service to anyone. More disturbing is that I now must trust that Google will not pull the rug out from me. Google hopes to analyze our photos and derive some economically useful data from the photos. ![]() I figure that in essence our cameras have become Google’s eyes in the real world. Back of the envelope calculation suggests this would cost Google about $4-5/year to store. I may have a paltry 14GB of images, but my wife is closing on 250GB. Okay, if you were suspicious about how Google made money from Picasa, how are they going to make money from the online service? Their overhead just skyrocketed. Simply upload all your photos to Google and they will be available via the Google Photos website or in the apps available for iOS or Android. Google would like you to move to their online service Google Photos. So, what is a user to do? Picasa to Google Photos: Would We Recommend? However, it was a stunning surprise for those of us who depended on the not-too-much nonsense,” get right down to work features” of Picasa. It certainly wasn’t a surprise to everyone that wondered how Google would make money off offering the best photo management tool for free. When Google announced that they were discontinuing Picasa, it wasn’t really a surprise to those of us that understand that any of the Google services may disappear at any time with little notice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |